All guides · Hard conversations

How to handle conflict between employees as a manager

Step in early, talk to each person alone first, and find out what the conflict is really about before you bring them together. Then hold one short joint meeting with ground rules, agree two or three specific changes in writing, and check in after one week and again after a month. If it involves harassment, threats or discrimination, it stops being a disagreement to mediate: write down what you know and go to HR the same day.

Most new managers wait. Two people stop talking, someone sighs in meetings, work starts moving around one person instead of through them, and the manager hopes it settles. It rarely does. Below: how to tell what kind of conflict you have, when to step in and when to leave it, what to say in each private talk, a 30-minute joint meeting you can run word for word, what to write down, when it becomes HR's process, and what to do when it comes back.

First, work out what kind of conflict it is

"They don't get along" is not a cause. Before you talk to anyone, write one sentence on what you think the conflict is about, then test it in the private talks. Most conflicts between two employees fall into one of five kinds, and each needs a different fix.

The first three are the most common and the easiest to solve, because the cause sits partly with how the work is set up, which is your job. That's worth remembering: a lot of "personality clashes" are two reasonable people stuck in a badly drawn line between their jobs. Negotiation researchers Roger Fisher and William Ury call this the difference between positions and interests: two people can hold opposite positions ("I should run the client call") while wanting things that fit together ("I need the client to trust our numbers" and "I need to stop being blamed for late changes").

When to step in, and when to let them sort it out

Not every disagreement needs you. People arguing about how to do the work, in the open, with respect, is a healthy team. Your job is to notice when it stops being about the work.

Leave it, but watch, when the disagreement is about ideas, it happens in the open, both still work together, and nobody has come to you.

Coach one or both privately when someone comes to you to complain. Ask, "Have you talked to them about it?" If not, help them plan that conversation, and set a date to hear how it went. You haven't stepped back; you've given them the first try.

Step in directly when any of these is true:

• The work is suffering: missed handoffs, duplicated work, a customer noticing.
• Other people on the team are being pulled in or picking sides.
• One of them has gone quiet in meetings or started avoiding shared tasks.
• They tried to talk it out and it got worse.
• It has lasted more than two weeks.

Go to HR the same day (see below) if anyone mentions harassment, threats, violence, discrimination, or a safety risk.

Talk to each person alone first

Never start with both in the room. Each person needs to be heard without the other there, and you need to hear both versions before you form a view. Hold the two talks on the same day, ideally back to back, so neither person feels the other got your ear first.

How to open

Keep it neutral and short. You're not accusing; you're asking.

"I've noticed things seem tense between you and Sam, especially around the weekly report. I'd like to understand what's going on from your side. I'm talking to Sam as well, and I'm not here to decide who's right. What's been happening?"

Then stop talking. Let them tell the whole story before you ask anything.

Questions that get past the first story

• "When did this start? What happened then?"
• "What's one recent example?" (Get the specific moment, not "always".)
• "What's the impact on your work?"
• "What do you think Sam would say if I asked them?"
• "What would need to change for this to feel workable?"
• "What could you do differently?"

The fourth question is the useful one. It asks them to see the other side without making them agree with it, and the answer often tells you exactly what the real issue is.

What not to do in the private talks

• Don't agree. "That sounds frustrating" is fine. "Yes, Sam does that to everyone" will be repeated.
• Don't carry messages. If you become the go-between ("Sam says you…"), they never have to talk to each other, and you own the conflict.
• Don't promise confidentiality you can't keep. Say: "I'll keep this between us unless it's something I have to act on, like a safety or conduct issue."
• Don't decide yet. End with: "Thank you. I'm going to talk to Sam, and then I'd like the three of us to sit down this week."

Before the joint meeting: decide what's yours to fix

After both talks, spend ten minutes alone with your notes. Write down:

1. The real issue, in one sentence both of them would accept. "Both of you think you own the client update, and neither knows what the other has already sent."
2. What's yours to fix before they meet: an unclear owner, a deadline you set badly, a workload you didn't notice. If the cause is a role line, decide it now. Don't make them negotiate something that is your decision.
3. Where they agree. There's nearly always something: they both want the report on time, they both hate the Friday scramble.
4. What you need from each, as behaviour, not attitude. "Reply to handoff messages the same day," not "be more of a team player."

If what you heard is about conduct (one person demeaning the other, comments about race, gender, religion, age or disability, threats), stop here. That is not a two-sided conflict to mediate. Go to the HR section.

A 30-minute joint meeting, step by step

Book a private room or a video call, 30 minutes, within two working days of the private talks. Sit so you're not at the head of the table between them. Have your notes, but don't read them out.

What to say to open

"Thanks for coming. I've talked to both of you, and I think you both want the same thing: the client update going out on time without the Friday scramble. The goal today isn't to decide who was right last month. It's to agree how you'll work together from Monday. Three rules: one person speaks at a time, we talk about what happened and not about what kind of person someone is, and we leave with something written down. Alex, would you start?"

The "say back" step

After each person speaks, ask the other: "What did you hear Alex say matters most to them?" Not whether they agree. Just what they heard. It slows the room down, and it's often the first time either has felt heard by the other. If they get it wrong, ask the speaker to correct it, then try again.

Naming the issue

"Here's what I'm hearing. You both think the client update is yours, and you each find out what the other sent after the fact. That's partly on me: I never said who owns it. So let me fix that part now: Alex owns the update; Sam owns the numbers in it and sends them by Thursday noon."

Agreeing changes

Ask each: "What's one thing you'll do differently?" Push for things you could see from the outside:

• "I'll send the numbers by Thursday noon, and message Alex if they'll be late."
• "I'll ask Sam before changing the numbers, not after."
• "If something bothers us, we'll say it to each other within a day, not in the team channel."

Closing

"Let me read back what we agreed. [Read it.] I'll send this to you both today. Let's take 15 minutes next Wednesday to see how it's going. Thank you both. I know that wasn't easy."

When the joint meeting goes sideways

The last one matters. Mediation is the first try, not the only one. When two people can't agree how to work together, you're still the manager, and you can set the rules of the work: who owns what, when things are due, how handoffs happen.

What to write down

Send both a short note the same day. It's not a warning; it's a record of what you all agreed, so nobody remembers it differently next month.

Subject: What we agreed today

Hi Alex and Sam, thanks for this afternoon. What we agreed:
1. Alex owns the weekly client update. Sam owns the numbers in it.
2. Sam sends the numbers by Thursday 12:00, or messages Alex by 10:00 if they'll be late.
3. Changes to the numbers go to Sam first.
4. If something bothers either of you, you'll raise it with each other within a day.
We'll check in Wednesday the 12th at 2:00. Let me know today if I've got anything wrong.

For yourself, keep a dated note of the private talks, the joint meeting and the follow-ups: what was said and agreed, in plain facts. If it comes back, or becomes a conduct issue, this is what HR will ask for.

When it stops being yours and becomes HR's

Some things look like a conflict between two employees but aren't. Don't mediate these, and don't promise anyone you'll keep them quiet. Write down what you were told (who, what, when, the words used) and contact HR, or your own manager if you have no HR, the same day:

• Harassment or comments about someone's sex, race, religion, age, disability, national origin or another protected trait.
• Any threat, physical contact, or fear for safety.
• One person has power over the other (they assign their work, rate them) and is using it.
• Someone says they've been retaliated against for raising a complaint.
• Theft, fraud, or a breach of a written company policy.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidance is clear that employers are expected to act on harassment they know about, and a supervisor knowing often counts as the company knowing. That's why "let them work it out" is the wrong move here, even if the person telling you asks you to do nothing.

What to say to the person who told you:

"Thank you for telling me. I take this seriously. I can't keep this to myself, because it's something the company has to look into, but I'll only share it with the people who need to know. Here's what happens next…"

Also bring in HR, without the urgency, when you've tried a joint meeting and a follow-up and nothing has changed, or when one person asks for a formal complaint.

The follow-up plan

Most conflicts that come back do so because nobody checked. Put these in your calendar the day of the joint meeting:

The 1:1 question is the quiet workhorse. People will tell you things alone that they won't say in a check-in with the other person in the room. If you aren't holding regular 1:1s yet, start; our guide on how to have an effective 1 on 1 has a 30-minute shape you can copy.

When it holds, notice it: "The handoffs have been smooth for three weeks. Thank you both." People rarely hear that a fixed problem was noticed.

When the conflict comes back

If the agreement breaks, find out how. Was it one person, or both? Was it the same issue, or a new one?

• Same issue, both slipping: the agreement was too vague. Meet again, make the changes more specific, and shorten the check-ins to weekly.
• One person keeps breaking it: it's no longer a conflict between two people. It's one person not doing what they agreed. That's a performance or conduct talk with them alone. Our guide on difficult conversations with employees has openings for it, and how to manage an underperforming employee covers the written plan if it keeps happening.
• A new issue every time: look at what's underneath. A workload or role problem you haven't fixed tends to surface as new arguments.
• They simply can't work closely together: sometimes the fix is structural. Change who works on what, so they hand off less. That's not failure; it's managing the work.

If the conflict involves you

If an employee is in conflict with you, you can't mediate it. You can still handle it well:

• Ask for a private talk and lead with listening: "I get the sense something's off between us. I'd like to hear it, even if it's about me."
• Say back what you heard before you answer it.
• Own your part plainly: "You're right that I changed the deadline without asking. I'll check with you first from now on."
• If it doesn't resolve, ask your own manager or HR to help. It's a normal step, not an admission.

This is harder if you were promoted from the team. Old peers may test whether you'll take sides. Our guide on managing former peers covers that case.

Mistakes new managers make with team conflict

• Waiting for it to pass. It doesn't. It spreads to the people around them.
• Meeting both together first. Neither can speak freely, and the louder one sets the story.
• Taking the first side you hear. The person who reaches you first isn't necessarily the one who's right.
• Making them negotiate your decision. If the problem is an unclear role, decide it.
• Being the messenger. Passing messages keeps them apart and makes you the problem.
• Agreeing on attitudes. "Communicate better" can't be checked. "Reply the same day" can.
• Talking about it to the rest of the team. Even "you've all seen the tension" makes it public.
• Mediating harassment. Conduct issues are not two-sided; take them to HR.
• Never following up. The check-ins are where it's actually solved.

Most new managers have a default here: some smooth things over too quickly, some avoid the talk entirely, some jump in and decide. The free leadership style quiz takes about 2 minutes and tells you which way you lean, and which hard conversations you're likely to put off.

Questions about conflict between employees

Should a manager get involved in conflict between employees?

Yes, once it affects the work, other people on the team, or has gone on more than a couple of weeks. Before that, coach each person to raise it with the other directly, and check whether they did.

How do you handle two employees who don't like each other?

You don't need them to like each other; you need them to work together. Focus on the specific behaviours at work (handoffs, tone in meetings, replies) and agree on those. Liking is their business.

Should I meet with both employees together or separately?

Separately first, on the same day, then together within two working days. Skip the joint meeting entirely if it's a conduct issue (harassment, threats); that goes to HR.

What if one employee refuses to meet?

Ask why, privately. Fear of the other person is a signal to slow down and possibly involve HR. Otherwise, say plainly that it's part of the job: "This is affecting the work, so I need us to sit down. I'll keep it to 30 minutes and I'll run it."

How do you answer "how would you handle conflict between two employees" in an interview?

Describe the steps on this page in order: talk to each privately, find the real issue, fix what's yours (roles, workload), hold a short joint meeting with ground rules, agree specific changes in writing, follow up at one week and one month, and escalate conduct issues to HR. A real example of when you did it helps more than the steps.

When should I document a conflict?

From the first private talk. Short, dated, factual notes: what each said, what was agreed, what happened next. You may never need them, but if you do, you'll need them from the start.

Next: take the free leadership style quiz to see which conversations you tend to avoid, or browse all our guides for new managers.

Sources

• Roger Fisher and William Ury, Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 1981 (3rd edition 2011): positions and interests.
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, "Harassment": https://www.eeoc.gov/harassment
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, "Retaliation": https://www.eeoc.gov/retaliation